Skip to content

Agentic AI for law firms

Built on precedent.
Made for what follows.

Writfold’s agents research, review, draft and carry whole matters for your firm, every step cited and every decision left to a lawyer.

Request accessWatch an agent work
  • 01

    Agents that do the work

    Briefed like an associate, they research, review, draft and run whole workflows under a written mandate.

  • 02

    Confidential, even in use

    Documents are processed inside hardware-sealed enclaves that must prove what they run before they see a page.

  • 03

    Accountable by design

    Every proposition is cited to its source. Every step of consequence waits for a named lawyer.

01 · The agent

Brief it like an associate. Review it like a partner.

Give Writfold the instruction you would give a capable associate. It plans the work, reads what it needs, checks its own citations against the source and returns a draft with its working shown. Nothing leaves the firm without a lawyer’s approval.

HM-0412Harrington v Vale
Ready
Instruction
AMA. MensahPartner09:14

Read the side letter Rachel sent this morning and tell me what it changes for us. Check everything that relied on section 14.2.

09:14WritfoldWF

Six steps planned. I will check each authority against the opinion and stop before anything is sent or filed.

Plan0 / 6 done
  1. Reading the side letter
    DOC-2207 · 4 pages · received 09:12
  2. Comparing it with section 14.2
    Supply agreement, 2023 · cap on liability
  3. Tracing what relied on the old wording
    Chronology, research memo, complaint, advice
  4. Checking authorities against the opinions
    Licensed research service · page by page
  5. Drafting a note for the partner
    Plain English · every statement sourced
  6. Waiting for A. Mensah
    Nothing is sent or filed without approval
Note for the partner0:00.0

The side letter of March 3, 2025 takes losses caused by late delivery outside the cap in section 14.2. If it binds Vale, Harrington’s delay claim is no longer limited to $250,000. Four items relied on the old wording and are marked for your review.

Sources relied on0
  • DOC-2207Side letter, Mar 3, 2025
  • DOC-0004Supply agreement, § 14.2
  • N.Y.2dGreenfield, 98 N.Y.2d 562, 569
  • N.Y.3dBeal Sav. Bank, 8 N.Y.3d 318, 324–25

Illustrative. A fictitious matter. The authorities are real; the product is in private development.

  1. 01

    Plans

    Breaks the instruction into steps you can inspect before it begins.

  2. 02

    Shows its working

    Every statement points to the page, paragraph or rule it came from.

  3. 03

    Stops at the line

    Sending, filing and paying wait for a named lawyer.

02 · Capabilities

Every part of the matter. One system.

Research, review, drafting, deadlines, knowledge and billing, designed to run on one record, carried by agents and owned by lawyers.

  • 01

    Research

    Authorities for the question actually asked, in the right jurisdiction and as the law stood on the relevant date, cited to the paragraph.

    Research note · Draft 1Illustrative
    Question
    Does the cap in clause 14.2 reach losses caused by late delivery?
    Limits
    England & Wales · law as at 21 Oct 2026
    Authority
    Arnold v Britton [2015] UKSC 36 at [15]

    Research agent

  • 02

    Review

    Contracts read as a whole bargain against the client’s positions: what changed between turns, what it affects elsewhere and what it concedes.

    Review agent

  • 03

    Drafting

    First drafts in Word, built from the matter record and the firm’s own precedents, every statement of fact traceable to its source.

    Drafting agent

  • 04

    Knowledge

    Precedents, clause positions and prior advice, open to those entitled to see them and to no one else.

    Firm knowledge

  • 05

    Billing and accounts

    Estimates, time, invoices, and trust or client money, kept on the same record as the work they account for.

    Accounts

  • 06

    Matters and deadlines

    Scope, status, risk and the next decision on one record. Deadlines calculated from the rule, with the working shown, and evidenced when met.

    Deadline · Answer to the complaintIllustrative
    Served
    Summons and complaint, U.S. District Court · Wed 4 Nov 2026
    Rule
    FRCP 12(a)(1)(A)(i) · answer within 21 days after service
    Due
    Wed 25 Nov 2026 · counted under FRCP 6(a)(1)

    Matter record

Writfold is in development with its founding firms. Capabilities describe what the platform is being built to do; the specimens come from an illustrative matter.

03 · How it works

One matter, from instruction to invoice.

An illustrative commercial dispute, run in Writfold. Agents do the reading, searching, drafting and tracing. The lawyers responsible make every decision that matters.

HM-0412Harrington Marine Ltd v Vale Logistics plc

Commercial dispute · England & Wales · Lead: A. Mensah

Pre-action

07 Oct: Instruction received. The intake agent turns the general counsel’s email into a brief: the objective, who may give instructions, what is out of scope and what is still unknown. The partner approves it before any other work begins.

Intake brief

Approved
Client
Harrington Marine Ltd
Instructed by
Rachel Hale, General Counsel
Objective
Recover losses from late deliveries under the 2023 supply agreement; preserve the trading relationship if possible.
Out of scope
Insurance recovery; employment issues.
Still unknown
Whether any variation was agreed in writing. Total losses for Q2 2024.

Approved by A. Mensah, Partner · 07 Oct 2026, 09:42

Illustrative.Parties, people and events are fictitious; the authorities and rules cited are real.

04 · Confidence

Sealed at rest. Sealed in transit. Sealed in use.

Most platforms encrypt client data while it is stored and while it travels. The moment it is processed, it lies open in a server’s memory, readable in principle by whoever runs the machine. Writfold is designed to close that gap, and to let the firm verify that it has.

  • Encrypted under keys the firm controls and can revoke at any time.

01 · At rest

Attestation before processing. If the proof fails, the work does not begin.

Before a page is released, the hardware must prove what it is running: the enclave measured, the software matched to an approved release, the firm’s key policy satisfied.

Illustrative · a design commitment for the platform in development

attestation · HM-0412

illustrative
  1. request attestation reportmatter HM-0412
  2. cpu enclave measuredsha384 9f2c…41a7
  3. gpu confidential modeon
  4. software matches approved releaser2026.10.2
  5. firm key policy satisfiedkeys released
  6. processing 2,184 documentssealed, in use

Design commitments

Not certifications

  • 01

    Ethical walls everywhere

    Ethical walls that hold everywhere: in search, summaries and agents, not only on folders.

  • 02

    No training on client material

    Client material is never used to train shared models.

  • 03

    Agents bound by mandate

    Agents act only within their mandate; permissions are enforced by the platform, not requested of the model.

  • 04

    A record the firm can inspect

    Every access, approval and disclosure is written to an audit record the firm can inspect.

  • 05

    Region of the firm’s choosing

    Data stays in the region the firm chooses.

  • 06

    Leave whole

    A firm can leave whole: matters, documents and history, exported in a form it can use without us.

Writfold is in private development. These are design commitments; certifications and independent assurance will be published as they are earned, and not before.

05 · Show their working

Agents that show their working.

Brief an agent as you would a capable associate. It works across the whole matter, and every proposition it puts before you carries its source: the document and page, the authority and paragraph, the rule and its arithmetic. Where the evidence will not support a conclusion, it says so.

Research note · Draft 1

Specimen · illustrative

Construction of the limitation of liability

Harrington Marine v Vale Logistics

Prepared by
Research agent
For
A. Mensah, Partner
Law as at
21 Oct 2026
Governing law

QuestionDoes the cap in section 14.2 reach losses caused by late delivery?

  1. A contract that is complete, clear and unambiguous on its face must be enforced according to the plain meaning of its terms.1 Extrinsic evidence is not admissible to create an ambiguity that section 14.2 does not have.2

  2. The agreement is read as a whole, and every part is interpreted with reference to the whole, so section 14.2 is construed together with the delivery provisions it limits.3

  3. A construction that would be absurd, commercially unreasonable or contrary to the reasonable expectations of the parties is to be avoided.4

    For review. This paragraph relies on section 14.2 as originally drafted. A side letter of 3 March 2025 (DOC-2207) amends it.

  1. 1Greenfield v. Philles Records, Inc., 98 N.Y.2d 562, 569 (2002).
  2. 2W.W.W. Assocs. v. Giancontieri, 77 N.Y.2d 157, 163 (1990).
  3. 3Beal Sav. Bank v. Sommer, 8 N.Y.3d 318, 324–25 (2007).
  4. 4Lipper Holdings, LLC v. Trident Holdings, LLC, 1 A.D.3d 170, 171 (1st Dep’t 2003).
Specimen: an agent’s research note. The authorities are real and pinpointed; the matter is fictitious. Not legal advice.

Review

Awaiting partner

Returns to

A. Mensah, Partner, for review

  • Four authorities cited, each to the paragraph
  • Paragraph 3 flagged: side letter DOC-2207

Specimen. An agent’s research note. The authorities are real and pinpointed; the matter is fictitious. Not legal advice.

06 · For every firm

From the solo practitioner to the global firm. One system beneath the whole firm.

Not another tool beside the practice, but the record it runs on: one identity, one set of permissions and one history, so that what is learnt in one part of the firm is known, properly, to the rest.

Lawyers in the firm

  1. 1
  2. 2–10
  3. 11–50
  4. 51–250
  5. 251–1,000
  6. 1,000+
01

The small practice

A complete practice system without an IT department: intake, matters, documents, trust and client money, and billing, in one place.

02

The national firm

Offices, practice groups and panels on a single record, with work allocated by competence, capacity and conflicts.

03

The global firm

Ethical walls, client-specific terms, cross-border teams and deployments in the regions each office requires, answering to the firm’s own security review.

Built to cover the whole practice

12 disciplines · one record

  1. Intake & conflicts

    Enquiries, identity, conflicts and engagement

  2. Matters

    Scope, status, risk and the next decision

  3. Clients

    A secure view of progress, in plain English

  4. Documents & evidence

    Every page read, every gap shown

  5. Research

    By jurisdiction, by date, cited to the paragraph

  6. Drafting & negotiation

    In Word, against the client’s positions

  7. Deadlines

    Calculated from the rule, evidenced when met

  8. Disputes

    Preservation and discovery, through to trial

  9. Transactions

    Diligence, conditions, closing and after

  10. Billing & accounts

    Estimates, time, invoices, trust and client money

  11. Knowledge

    Precedents and experience, permission-aware

  12. Risk & supervision

    Approvals, complaints and a full audit trail

Jurisdictions

The United States and England & Wales first, with further jurisdictions to follow. Each is switched on only once its law, procedure and forms have been validated.

FirstUnited States
FirstEngland & Wales
To followFurther jurisdictions

07 · Founding firms

Every institution was once new.

Writfold is being built with a small number of founding firms, whose partners and practice teams will shape what it becomes. If yours should be among them, we would be glad to hear from you.

Or write to us directly at [email protected].

  • A small number of founding firms
  • Every request answered personally

We use these details only to reply to you.